lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Now, as the access(X_OK) is fixed, would it be
> feasible for ld.so to start using it?

Just must be kidding. No access control can be reliably implemented at
userlevel. There is no point starting something as stupid as this.

--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-07 18:33    [W:0.118 / U:0.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site