[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] splice : two smp_mb() can be omitted
On Tue, Oct 31 2006, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This patch deletes two calls to smp_mb() that were done after
> mutex_unlock() that contains an implicit memory barrier.
> The first one in splice_to_pipe(), where 'do_wakeup' is set to true only if
> pipe->inode is set (and in this case the
> if (pipe->inode)
> mutex_unlock(&pipe->inode->i_mutex);
> is done too)
> The second one in link_pipe(), following inode_double_unlock() that
> contains calls to mutex_unlock() too.

NAK on that patch, the smp_mb() follows the waitqueue_active(). If you
later change the code and move the locks or whatnot, you have lost that

If you change the patch to insert a comment, then it may be more

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-31 08:33    [W:0.077 / U:1.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site