lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: feature-removal-schedule obsoletes
On Sat, 28 October 2006 10:34:51 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
> What should be used to replace it? The MMC block driver uses it to
> manage the block device queue. I am not that intimate with the block
> layer so I do not know the proper fix.

Why does the MMC block driver use a thread? Is there a technical
reason for this or could it be done in original process context as
well, removing some code and useless cpu scheduler overhead?

Jörn

--
When people work hard for you for a pat on the back, you've got
to give them that pat.
-- Robert Heinlein
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-31 17:01    [W:0.137 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site