lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
    Pavel wrote:
    > My point is that a good infrastrucure doesn't care wether
    > or not beancounter (group controller) has a parent.

    I am far more interested in the API, including the shape
    of the data model, that we present to the user across the
    kernel-user boundary.

    Getting one, good, stable API for the long haul is worth alot.

    Whether or not some substantial semantic change in this, such
    as going from a flat to a tree shape, can be done in a single
    line of kernel code, or a thousand lines, is less important.

    What is the right long term kernel-user API and data model?

    --
    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-30 15:33    [W:3.361 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site