Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:48:43 -0500 (EST) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | Re: why test for "__GNUC__"? |
| |
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:44:18AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > p.s. is there, in fact, any part of the kernel source tree that has a > > preprocessor directive to identify the use of ICC? just curious. > > Please, do > > ls include/linux/compiler-*
but according to compiler.h:
/* Intel compiler defines __GNUC__. So we will overwrite implementations * coming from above header files here */
so even ICC will define __GNUC__, which means that testing for __GNUC__ is *still*, under the circumstances, redundant, isn't that right?
rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |