[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] drivers: wait for threaded probes between initcall levels
On Fri, Oct 27, Alan Cox wrote:

> Ar Gwe, 2006-10-27 am 11:42 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton:
> > IOW, we want to be multithreaded _within_ an initcall level, but not between
> > different levels.
> Thats actually insufficient. We have link ordered init sequences in
> large numbers of driver subtrees (ATA, watchdog, etc). We'll need
> several more initcall layers to fix that.

Is it time for something better?
True dependencies, an addition to or as replacement for module_init()?
random example: hfs/super.c:
depends_on_initialized(init_hfs_fs: init_hfsplus_fs,kmem_cache_thingie,core_filesystem_thingie,foo,bar,worldpeace);
If init_hfsplus_fs() does not exist it should be no error.

Whatever the sytax will be and however its parsed during build, that link order
requirement bites every other month.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-28 01:23    [W:0.198 / U:4.812 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site