[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:19:00PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> This means that ndiswrapper would be considered as a derived work of
> Linux. Since ndiswrapper is under GPL, it would suffer unfairly if the
> meaning of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is extended to restrict GPLed modules
> capable of loading proprietary code into the kernel.

You could always write a tiny GPL-ed wrapper module with the sole
purpose of offering all EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL'ed functions through
EXPORT_SYMBOL'ed wrapper functions.

You are using a address for publically stating that trying to
prevent such kinds of wrapping was unfair?

It's not even clear that any modules containing non-GPL'ed code were

EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL shows a pretty clear intention, and offering
functionality provided throug h EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL'ed symbols to
proprietary code sounds very fishy.

> Regards,
> Pavel Roskin



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-26 23:49    [W:0.090 / U:8.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site