lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: rename() contention (BUG?)
Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 08:43:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> The changes make the mutex more efficient, but won't decrease the
>> contention. It seems that all renames in one filesystem are serialized,
>> and if the renames require I/O (which is certainly the case with nfs),
>> rename throughput is severely limited.
>>
>
> They are, and for a good reason. For details see
> Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking.
>

Is it possible to lock only the common subtree of the two paths?

Perhaps walk towards the root of the tree, starting with the deeper
path, locking one component at a time. Then walk both paths together
locking components ordered by something to avoid deadlock.

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-26 23:23    [W:0.029 / U:8.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site