lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] Use next_balance instead of last_balance
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:

> > Hmmmm... We change the point at which we calculate the interval relative to
> > load balancing. So move it after the load balance. This also avoids having
> > to do the calculation if the sched_domain has not expired.
>
> That still doesn't take into account if the CPU goes idle/busy during
> the interval.

How does the current version take that into account? As far as I can tell
we take the busy / idle stuation at the point in time when
rebalance_tick() is called. We do not track whever the cpu gues idle/busy
in the interval.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-26 20:21    [W:0.028 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site