Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Chase Venters <> | Subject | Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper | Date | Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:12:26 -0500 |
| |
On Monday 23 October 2006 01:40, Giridhar Pemmasani wrote: > Exactly - the loader within ndiswrapper taints kernel versions 2.6.10 and > newer (older kernels don't have a way of tainting the kernel). The code is > in loader.c in ndiswrapper.
Next question - what version of ndiswrapper started voluntary tainting (or has it always?)
That is to say, are there versions of ndiswrapper floating around out there in the ether capable of building against 2.6.19-rc* that don't voluntarily add_taint()? (I'm guessing the answer is 'no', but the answer is possibly important to consider)
The attached patch (untested) should keep the kernel from self-tainting when ndiswrapper is inserted. The last question, then, is how everyone else feels about this. Objections to removing the mandatory ndiswrapper taint?
Signed-off-by: Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c index 67009bd..f948a2c 100644 --- a/kernel/module.c +++ b/kernel/module.c @@ -1717,8 +1717,6 @@ #endif /* Set up license info based on the info section */ set_license(mod, get_modinfo(sechdrs, infoindex, "license")); - if (strcmp(mod->name, "ndiswrapper") == 0) - add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE); if (strcmp(mod->name, "driverloader") == 0) add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |