lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: fs/Kconfig question regarding CONFIG_BLOCK
    Date
    From
    Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
    > On Tue, Oct 17 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    > > >> Never mind, I see that some filesystems have 'depends on BLOCK' instead
    > > >> of being wrapped into if BLOCK. Not really consistent but whatever.
    > > >
    > > >Feel free to send in patches that make things more consistent.
    > >
    > > How would you like things? if BLOCK or depends on BLOCK?
    >
    > Well, if you can hide an entire block with if BLOCK, then that would be
    > preferred. Otherwise depends on BLOCK.
    >
    > > Does menuconfig/oldconfig/etc. parse the whole config structure faster
    > > it it done either way?
    >
    > I'd be surprised if if BLOCK wasn't faster over, say, 10 depends on
    > BLOCK.

    I'd be /very/ surprised if anybody even noticed...
    --
    Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
    Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
    Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
    Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-21 02:17    [W:0.024 / U:29.188 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site