lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: fs/Kconfig question regarding CONFIG_BLOCK
Date
From
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >> Never mind, I see that some filesystems have 'depends on BLOCK' instead
> > >> of being wrapped into if BLOCK. Not really consistent but whatever.
> > >
> > >Feel free to send in patches that make things more consistent.
> >
> > How would you like things? if BLOCK or depends on BLOCK?
>
> Well, if you can hide an entire block with if BLOCK, then that would be
> preferred. Otherwise depends on BLOCK.
>
> > Does menuconfig/oldconfig/etc. parse the whole config structure faster
> > it it done either way?
>
> I'd be surprised if if BLOCK wasn't faster over, say, 10 depends on
> BLOCK.

I'd be /very/ surprised if anybody even noticed...
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-21 02:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans