Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:53:44 -0500 (CDT) | From | "Scott E. Preece" <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] OMAP1 PM Core, PM Core Implementation 2/2 |
| |
| From: Heikki Orsila<shd@zakalwe.fi> | | On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:58:33PM -0500, Scott E. Preece wrote: | > It also helps with static analysis tools. | | I'd say those analysis tools are pretty useless if they can not handle | trivial cases like this. | | > CodingStyle seems to | > be silent on the point, but points to Kernighan and Ritchie, who say | > "These initializations are actually unnecessary, since all are zero, but | > it's a good idea to make them explicit anyway." | | It was a local variable. They are not autoinitialised. Are you perhaps | mixing this with statics and globals? ---
Indeed - I answered too quickly.
However, as noted, there's no practical cost to including the initializations and some of us do work in places where it's normallly required.
scott -- scott preece motorola mobile devices, il67, 1800 s. oak st., champaign, il 61820 e-mail: preece@motorola.com fax: +1-217-384-8550 phone: +1-217-384-8589 cell: +1-217-433-6114 pager: 2174336114@vtext.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |