Messages in this thread | | | From | "jdow" <> | Subject | Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc | Date | Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:31:39 -0700 |
| |
From: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org> > On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: >> >> How did OSDL's MX checking deal with split in/out configurations like ours, >> where our MX points at a load-balanced farm of Mirapoint front end appliances >> with 1 IP address, but our main off-campus *outbound* comes from a different >> address? > > Hey, if I knew what I was doing, I'd be in MIS. > > As it is, I just criticise other peoples patches.
DK or DKIM comes to mind. SpamAssassin 3.1.5 handles it neatly.
Off hand expecting a list to maintain perfect anti-spam is rather difficult. Distributed processing works better. Folks should have their own anti-spam tools and train them to their own preferences.
(It helps with a list like this one to have a SpamAssassin meta rule that boosts the scores for BAYES_80 and above while reducing scores for BAYES_40 and below. It also helps to run a lot of the SARE, SpamAssassin Rules Emporium, rule sets. Pick and choose for your particular needs. http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules)
{^_^} Joanne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |