Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:03:11 +0000 | From | andrew@walrond ... | Subject | Re: make headers_install headers problem on sparc64 |
| |
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:50:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Hm, yes. There's still a lot of crap being exposed there that we really > don't need to be showing. Try this entirely untested patch... > > The sparc64 version could do with something similar, too. >
I'm on sparc64 (pure 64bit) so I can't test your patch. For reference, I used this (not as smart as yours) patch:
diff -Naur linux-2.6.18.1/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h linux-2.6.18.1-fix/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h --- linux-2.6.18.1/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h 2006-09-20 03:42:06.000000000 +0000 +++ linux-2.6.18.1-fix/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h 2006-10-19 08:57:11.000000000 +0000 @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ #define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE 0x0000010000000000UL #endif
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
/* This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what instruction set this cpu supports. */ @@ -163,6 +164,8 @@
#define ELF_HWCAP sparc64_elf_hwcap();
+#endif + /* This yields a string that ld.so will use to load implementation specific libraries for optimization. This is more specific in intent than poking at uname or /proc/cpuinfo. */
Andrew Walrond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |