[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: fsstack: struct path
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:31:03AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > One, rather unfortunate, fact is that struct path is also defined in
> > > include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h as something completely different - reiserfs
> > > specific.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> >
> > reiserfs is being bad. s/path/reiserfs_path/g
> Indeed. That's one pending patch that never got around to be submitted
> (and had bitrotten at least 3 times, IIRC).
> ACK, provided that reiserfs folks are OK with the replacement name for
> their struct. Note that "path" in question has very little to do with
> pathnames - it's a path in balanced tree, IIRC. So if we get around
> to renaming that sucker, it might be a good time to pick better name.

Aside from having to reindent the reiserfs tree afterwards, I doubt
anyone would mind (please cc reiserfs-dev on the patch though). Al is
right, it's a path in the balanced tree.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-18 16:41    [W:0.044 / U:1.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site