[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Bandwidth Allocations under CFQ I/O Scheduler
Jens Axboe wrote:
> While that may make some sense internally, the exported interface would
> never be workable like that. It needs to be simple, "give me foo kb/sec
> with max latency bar for this file", with an access pattern or assumed
> sequential io.
> Nobody speaks of iops/sec except some silly benchmark programs. I know
> that you are describing pseudo-iops, but it still doesn't make it more
> clear.
> Things aren't as simple
How about "give me 10% of total io capacity?" People understand
this, and the io scheduler can then guarantee this by ensuring
that the process gets 1 out of 10 io requests as long as it
keeps submitting enough.

The admin can then set a reasonable percentage depending on
the machine's capacity.

Helge Hafting
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-18 13:07    [W:0.063 / U:1.392 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site