lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 6/6] mm: fix pagecache write deadlocks
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:14:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:44:52 +0200 (CEST)
> Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > - This also showed up a number of buggy prepare_write / commit_write
> > implementations that were setting the page uptodate in the prepare_write
> > side: bad! this allows uninitialised data to be read. Fix these.
>
> Well. It's non-buggy under the current protocol because the page remains
> locked throughout. This patch would make these ->prepare_write()
> implementations buggy.

But if it becomes uptodate, then do_generic_mapping_read can read it
without locking it (and so can filemap_nopage at present, although it
looks like that's going to take the page lock soon).

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> > + fault_in_pages_readable(buf, bytes);
> > +#endif
>
> I'll need to remember to take that out later on. Or reorder the patches, I
> guess.
>
> > int simple_commit_write(struct file *file, struct page *page,
> > - unsigned offset, unsigned to)
> > + unsigned from, unsigned to)
> > {
> > - struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> > - loff_t pos = ((loff_t)page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + to;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * No need to use i_size_read() here, the i_size
> > - * cannot change under us because we hold the i_mutex.
> > - */
> > - if (pos > inode->i_size)
> > - i_size_write(inode, pos);
> > - set_page_dirty(page);
> > + if (to > from) {
> > + struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> > + loff_t pos = ((loff_t)page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + to;
> > +
> > + if (to - from == PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
> > + SetPageUptodate(page);
>
> This SetPageUptodate() can go away?

It is needed because the prepare_write does not try to bring the page
uptodate if it is a full page write. (I was considering another patch
to just remove that completely, as it might be overkill for something
like sysfs, but it demonstrates the principle quite nicely).

>
> > @@ -2317,17 +2320,6 @@ int nobh_prepare_write(struct page *page
> >
> > if (is_mapped_to_disk)
> > SetPageMappedToDisk(page);
> > - SetPageUptodate(page);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Setting the page dirty here isn't necessary for the prepare_write
> > - * function - commit_write will do that. But if/when this function is
> > - * used within the pagefault handler to ensure that all mmapped pages
> > - * have backing space in the filesystem, we will need to dirty the page
> > - * if its contents were altered.
> > - */
> > - if (dirtied_it)
> > - set_page_dirty(page);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Local variable `dirtied_it' can go away now.
>
> Or can it? We've modified the page's contents. If the copy_from_user gets
> a fault and we do a zero-length ->commit_write(), nobody ends up dirtying
> the page.

But only if the page is not uptodate. Otherwise we won't modify its contents
(no need to).

> > @@ -2450,6 +2436,7 @@ int nobh_truncate_page(struct address_sp
> > memset(kaddr + offset, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset);
> > flush_dcache_page(page);
> > kunmap_atomic(kaddr, KM_USER0);
> > + SetPageUptodate(page);
> > set_page_dirty(page);
> > }
> > unlock_page(page);
>
> I've already forgotten why this was added. Comment, please ;)

Well, nobh_prepare_write no longer sets it uptodate, so we need to if
we're going to set_page_dirty. OTOH, why does truncate_page need to
zero the pagecache anyway? I wonder if we couldn't delete this whole
function? (not in this patchset!)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-14 06:25    [W:0.089 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site