[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] stackfs: generic functions for obtaining hidden object
    In message <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610131615370.563@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>, Pekka J Enberg writes:
    > From: Pekka Enberg <>
    > Add generic functions for obtaining the hidden object (superblock, inode,
    > dentry, and dentry mount-point) in a stacked filesystem. As fan-out
    > stacked filesystems have multiple hidden objects, we store them in a
    > statically allocated array of pointers. The current hard-coded limit
    > STACKFS_MAX_BRANCHES is not enough for unionfs (for which users have more
    > than 100 branches). That, however, can be fixed later for unionfs.

    I think we should do it right the first time (i.e., now :-)

    > +#define STACKFS_MAX_BRANCHES (8)

    > +struct stackfs_sb_info {
    > + struct super_block *hidden_sbs[STACKFS_MAX_BRANCHES];
    > +};

    Why not make it something more dynamic, such as a mount-time option per sb?
    Even at 8, you waste most of that space for non-fan-out stackable file
    systems such as ecryptfs; and those unionfs users who want more, will have
    to _recompile_ the code.

    And given that this code is shared, if just one f/s needs 100 branches, why
    should ecryptfs waste 99*sizeof(pointer) bytes for every *_info structure?

    > +static inline struct super_block *
    > +__stackfs_hidden_sb(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long branch_idx)
    > +{
    > + struct stackfs_sb_info *info = sb->s_fs_info;
    > + return info->hidden_sbs[branch_idx];
    > +}

    Also, the functions don't check array bounds. Where, if at all, this gets
    checked against the STACKFS_MAX_BRANCHES value? Shouldn't we at least put
    some ASSERT's in there to catch bugs?

    Of course, I realize that the above code is rather simple now and changing
    it as I propose will require kmalloc/kfree (or containers) carefully used

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-13 17:47    [W:0.022 / U:139.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site