[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Can context switches be faster?
    On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:

    > Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    >> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 14:25 -0400, John Richard Moser wrote:
    >>> - Does the current code act on these behaviors, or just flush all
    >>> cache regardless?
    >> the cache flushing is a per architecture property. On x86, the cache
    >> flushing isn't needed; but a TLB flush is. Depending on your hardware
    >> that can be expensive as well.
    > So, that is needed for a full process context switch to another process.
    > Is the context switch between threads quicker as it should not need to
    > flush the TLB?

    Indeed. This is also true for switching from a process to a kernel thread
    and back, because kernel threads don't have their own user-space virtual
    memory; they just live inside the kernel virtual memory mapped into every

    > James

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-13 16:55    [W:0.050 / U:9.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site