| Date | Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:35:22 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [stable] [patch 00/67] 2.6.18-stable review |
| |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > And yes, we realize that this is a large number of patches, sorry... > > I number of these patches were cleanups, such as removing code betewen > #if 0, removing header files from being exported, etc. Not bad > things, but I wouldn't have thought it would have met the criteria for > being added to -stable. Are you intentionally relaxing the criteria?
The header file stuff was intentionally added, as it is good to have the header files exported properly. Those were a large number of these patches.
If you have specific questions about any one patch, please let us know. I didn't purposefully take any "cleanup" type patch that I know of, but there was a lot here, so one might have slipped in...
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|