[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] use %p for pointers

    >> > > %p will do no such thing in the kernel. As for the difference...
    >> > > %x
    >> > > might happen to work on some architectures (where sizeof(void
    >> > > *)==sizeof(int)),
    >> > > but it's not portable _and_ not right. %p is proper C for that...
    >> Ah I see your point, but then again, %lx could have been used. Unless
    >> there is some arch where sizeof(long) != sizeof(void *).
    > That really makes gcc bitch, *and* it's wrong for a whole bunch of reasons.

    Ah my bad. Thanks for the slap reminder. :)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-11 21:33    [W:0.033 / U:38.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site