[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] use %p for pointers

>> > > %p will do no such thing in the kernel. As for the difference...
>> > > %x
>> > > might happen to work on some architectures (where sizeof(void
>> > > *)==sizeof(int)),
>> > > but it's not portable _and_ not right. %p is proper C for that...
>> Ah I see your point, but then again, %lx could have been used. Unless
>> there is some arch where sizeof(long) != sizeof(void *).
> That really makes gcc bitch, *and* it's wrong for a whole bunch of reasons.

Ah my bad. Thanks for the slap reminder. :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-11 21:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean