[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs/eventpoll: error handling micro-cleanup
    On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:

    > Davide Libenzi wrote:
    > > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > >
    > > > While reviewing the 'may be used uninitialized' bogus gcc warnings,
    > > > I noticed that an error code assignment was only needed if an error had
    > > > actually occured.
    > >
    > > But that saved one line of code, and there are countless occurences in the
    > > kernel of such code pattern ;)
    > I'm not sure there are countless occurrences with PTR_ERR(). The line is
    > incorrect (but harmless) if inode is a valid pointer...

    I just tried a `find /usr/src/linux-2.6.16/ -type f -exec grep -H -C 2 PTR_ERR {} \;`
    and looked at the cases where the error variable is assigned in any case
    before the test. Same code pattern as, like:

    error = -EFAULT;
    if (copy_from_user(...))
    goto kaboom;

    Again, expect a big patch if you're gonna fix all those ;)

    - Davide

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-01 18:21    [W:0.023 / U:3.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site