[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Inclusion of x86_64 memorize ioapic at bootup patch
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:02:16AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton <> writes:
> >
> > Please don't top-post.
> >
> >>
> >> On 1/2/06, Vivek Goyal <> wrote:
> >> > Hi Andi,
> >> >
> >> > Can you please include the following patch. This patch has already been
> > pushed
> >> > by Andrew.
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> > IIRC, I dropped this patch because of discouraging noises from Andi and
> > because underlying x86_64 changes broke it in ugly ways.
> Ok. I just as extensively as I could and I can't find the under laying
> x86_64 changes that Andi mentioned he was working on. I have looked
> in current -mm and in Andi merge and experimental quilt trees. It
> could be that I'm blind but I looked and I did not see them.
> Even in the discussion where this was mentioned there never was a
> semantic conflict. But rather two patches passing so close they
> touched the same or neighboring lines of code.
> > It needs to be
> > redone and Andi's objections (whatever they were) need to be addressed or
> > argued about.
> The difference was one of approach. Andi wanted us to treat the apics
> as black boxes and save and restore register values with no regard as
> to what the registers did. This is theoretically more future proof,
> but it looses flexibility.

Well I still think it would be better to do it in the generic way,
but i'm not feeling very strongly about it anymore.

> to change the destination cpu, in the kexec on panic case. This
> is something that cannot be done if we simply saved off the registers.
> > Right now the patch is rather dead.
> Current the referred to patch applies just fine, to 2.6.15,
> and except for a conflict with the above mentioned patch which
> applies fine to 2.6.15-mm1 as well.

It conflicts with the x86-64 timer routing rewrite I did, but that's currently
on hold because it has some other issues. I can merge them later, no problem.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-06 20:03    [W:0.172 / U:2.332 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site