Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:10:34 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch |
| |
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0000, Nick Warne wrote: > On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:30, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > > (according to kernel.org). Yet there is no upgrade path for that build > > > (or any other .x releases) > > > > > > It is a bit of a mess really. > > > > but, a 2.6.14.6 kernel might come out *after* 2.6.15, then what? > > Nightmares...
It's already happened, we did a 2.6.13.y release after 2.6.14 was out, and I'm about to do a 2.6.14.y release in a few days too :)
> I get all the points. Let me say then it needs better distinction on > what the 'latest kernel' is and on what the 'latest -stable' is.
Ok, exactly how would you like this to be shown?
Again, 2.6.15 is the latest stable kernel right now. Just because there isn't a .1 release yet, doesn't mean it isn't.
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |