Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND] move swiotlb.h header file to asm-generic | Date | Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:08:39 +0100 |
| |
On Monday 30 January 2006 11:01, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:49:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Monday 30 January 2006 10:44, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > > This patch: > > > > > > - creates asm-generic/swiotlb.h > > > - makes it use 'enum dma_data_direction dir' rather than 'int dir' > > > - updates x86-64 and IA64 to use the common swiotlb.h > > > - fixes the resulting fall out (s/int dir/enum dma_data_direction dir/ > > > all over the place). > > > > Al Viro will likely flame you badly for that enum change. Apparently it > > causes some trouble in sparse. Frankly i don't see the point neither. > > It just makes the code harder to read and creates a monstrosity of a patch > > and doesn't give you anything. > > DMA-API.txt uses the enum form; so do arm, frv, mips, parisc and > powerpc. x86-64, IA64, alpha, sparc, sparc64 and v850 use the int > form. I really couldn't care less whether we use an enum or an int for > the DMA data direction in the DMA API, as long as all archs used the > same thing. I don't feel comfortable putting swiotlb.h in generic code > unless it really is generic. So... which should it be?
I vote for int.
-Andi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |