lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RT] possible bug in trace_start_sched_wakeup

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> trace_special_pid(sch.task->pid, sch.task->prio, p->prio);
> - if (sch.task && (sch.task->prio >= p->prio))
> + if (sch.task && ((sch.task->prio <= p->prio) || !rt_task(p)))
> sch.task = NULL;

this second condition i'd not change: it just expresses the rare case
where a higher-prio task hits the CPU that we somehow did not start to
trace. In that case we just zap the current trace.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-27 10:56    [W:0.032 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site