lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: GPL V3 and Linux
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:54:07 +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch said:
    > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 22:10 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

    > > 17 USC 1201(a)(1)(A) says:
    > >
    > > (A) No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively
    > ^^^^^^^^^^
    > > controls access to a work protected under this title. The prohibition conta
    ined
    > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    > Actually there is similar wording here (but of course in German) used
    > for the similar purpose. The problem with this kind of law is IMHO:
    > -) "effectively controls access": If I (or someone else) can circumvent
    > it, it is obviously not "effective".

    As Skylarov found out when he got into a pissing match with Adobe, ROT-13
    qualifies as an "effective access control" as far as the law is concerned.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-27 18:53    [W:0.024 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site