Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:02:58 +0900 | From | Samuel Masham <> | Subject | Re: pthread_mutex_unlock (was Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow) |
| |
On 26/01/06, Samuel Masham <samuel.masham@gmail.com> wrote: > comment: > As a rt person I don't like the idea of scheduler bounce so the way > round seems to be have the mutex lock acquiring work on a FIFO like > basis.
which is obviously wrong...
Howeve my basic point stands but needs to be clarified a bit:
I think I can print non-compliant if the mutex acquisition doesn't respect the higher priority of the waiter over the current process even if the mutex is "available".
OK? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |