Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:52:31 +0100 | From | Paolo Ornati <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1 |
| |
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:25:37 -0500 Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> This seems right to me, how do you expect X to be treated by the > scheduler?
Why moving the mouse a little (that causes a microscopic % of CPU being used) makes X priority jump up to 29 from 6/7 ???
And why this doesn't happen when glxgears (for example) is running? (under cpu load this is different, with X never getting "good" priority -- if I remember correctly)
Maybe this is normal and depends on the way X sleeps or something...
I don't know much about schedulers but if I'm able to make the cursor going in jerks with just a bit of CPU load (linux$ make -j16, for example) I wonder why X cannot get a better priority...
-- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.16-rc1-plugsched on x86_64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |