lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: soft update vs journaling?
From
Date
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 20:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >...
> > - I would not use a journalling filesystem at all on media that degrades
> > faster as harddisks (flash drives, CD-RWs/DVD-RWs/RAMs).
> > There are specially-crafted filesystems for that, mostly jffs and udf.
> >...
>
> [ ] you know what the "j" in "jffs" stands for

it stands for "logging" since jffs2 at least is NOT a journalling
filesystem.... but a logging one. I assume jffs is too.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-22 20:10    [W:0.210 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site