lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: soft update vs journaling?
    On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:08:17PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 20:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    > > >...
    > > > - I would not use a journalling filesystem at all on media that degrades
    > > > faster as harddisks (flash drives, CD-RWs/DVD-RWs/RAMs).
    > > > There are specially-crafted filesystems for that, mostly jffs and udf.
    > > >...
    > >
    > > [ ] you know what the "j" in "jffs" stands for
    >
    > it stands for "logging" since jffs2 at least is NOT a journalling
    > filesystem.... but a logging one. I assume jffs is too.

    Ah, sorry.

    It seems I confused this with Reiser4 and it's wandering logs.

    cu
    Adrian

    --

    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-22 20:28    [W:0.021 / U:0.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site