lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: soft update vs journaling?
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:08:17PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 20:05 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >...
> > > - I would not use a journalling filesystem at all on media that degrades
> > > faster as harddisks (flash drives, CD-RWs/DVD-RWs/RAMs).
> > > There are specially-crafted filesystems for that, mostly jffs and udf.
> > >...
> >
> > [ ] you know what the "j" in "jffs" stands for
>
> it stands for "logging" since jffs2 at least is NOT a journalling
> filesystem.... but a logging one. I assume jffs is too.

Ah, sorry.

It seems I confused this with Reiser4 and it's wandering logs.

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-22 20:28    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans