lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: My vote against eepro* removal
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 18:01 -0800, John Ronciak wrote:
    > There is a timer routine in the eepro100 driver which does the check
    > for link as well as a check for on of the hang conditions (with
    > work-around). It does the check for link in a different way than
    > e100. e100 uses mii call where eepro100 does it manually. Another
    > difference is that eepro100 doesn't get stats unless called by the
    > system. It's not in the timer routine at all.
    >
    > Can we try a couple of things? 1) just comment out all the check for
    > link code in the e100 driver and give that a try and 2) just comment
    > out the update stats call and see if that works. These seem to be the
    > differences and we need to know which one is causing the problem.

    Heh, FWIW, Microsoft found this exact same bug with 2 different chipsets
    in their latency testing (see section 4.4):

    http://research.microsoft.com/~mbj/papers/tr-98-29.html

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-21 04:59    [W:0.022 / U:0.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site