Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:19:33 -0800 | From | John Ronciak <> | Subject | Re: My vote against eepro* removal |
| |
On 1/20/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > Seems like the important question is, why does e100 need a watchdog if > eepro100 works fine without one? Isn't the point of a watchdog in this > context to work around other bugs in the driver (or the hardware)? There are a number of things that the watchdog in e100 does. It checks link (up, down), reads the hardware stats, adjusts the adaptive IFS and checks to 3 known hang conditions based on certain types of the hardware. You might be able to get around without doing the work-arounds (as long as you don't' see hangs happening with the hardware being used) but the checking of the link and the stats are probably needed.
-- Cheers, John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |