[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Development tree, PLEASE?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:17:40AM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Normally I wouldn't care, and I'd just stay away from 'stable' until
> someone finally figured out that a dev tree really is needed, but I can't
> stay quiet anymore. 2.6.x is anything but stable right now. It might be
> stable in the sense that most any development kernel is stable in that it
> runs without crashing, but it's not at all stable in the sense that
> everything is changing as if it were an odd numbered dev tree.

Please detail your specific problems that you are having. General rants
don't help anyone except make you feel better :)


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-20 20:18    [W:0.199 / U:40.464 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site