Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:41:13 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: Development tree, PLEASE? |
| |
> Lots of things still out there depend on devfs. So now if I want to develop my > kmod on recent kernels I have to be in the business of maintaining a lot more > userland stuff, like mkinitrd, installers, etc. that have come to rely on > devfs.
Just like the OSS-ALSA/e100 debate: If there IS something that you do not like [something that requires devfs], why has NO ONE objected? (Quoting Greg: "and I have not heard a single peep out of anyone about the email titled "Subject: devfs going away, last chance to complain"") Not to forget there is ndevfs if you really need it.
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |