[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:43:31PM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> For EEPROM/flash management:
> READ_EEPROM reads the flash. WRITE_EEPROM writes it. I don't
> see a standard way of doing this in the kernel; many drivers
> provide their own private ioctls, some on dedicated special
> files. I think that using read and write instead would be okay
> (with a small qualm about semantics), but this idea makes an
> influential coworker barf violently. I can't see how we could
> use the ethtool flash interface: the low-level driver doesn't
> look like a regular net device, and we support partial updates
> of the flash.

Use the firmware subsystem for this. It uses sysfs so ioctl needed at


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-19 01:55    [W:0.157 / U:1.404 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site