Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:07:22 -0800 | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ... |
| |
Michael Tokarev wrote: > How about epoll_pwait() instead? It looks more appropriate, for > my eyes anyway. (Just a name, nothing more)
It's just a name but I have thought along the same lines. It's just more pleasing.
-- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |