[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
    On Jan 17, 2006, at 06:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
    > This is about code complexity/bloat. It's already complex enouth.
    > I rely on the stability of the linux softraid subsystem, and want
    > it to be reliable. Adding more features, especially non-trivial
    > ones, does not buy you bugfree raid subsystem, just the opposite:
    > it will have more chances to crash, to eat your data etc, and will
    > be harder in finding/fixing bugs.

    What part of: "You will need to enable the experimental
    MD_RAID5_RESHAPE config option for this to work." isn't bvious? If
    you don't want this feature, either don't turn on
    CONFIG_MD_RAID5_RESHAPE, or don't use the raid5 mdadm reshaping
    command. This feature might be extremely useful for some people
    (including me on occasion), but I would not trust it even on my
    family's fileserver (let alone a corporate one) until it's been
    through several generations of testing and bugfixing.

    Kyle Moffett

    There is no way to make Linux robust with unreliable memory
    subsystems, sorry. It would be like trying to make a human more
    robust with an unreliable O2 supply. Memory just has to work.
    -- Andi Kleen

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-17 15:07    [W:0.020 / U:1.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site