Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:05:33 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench |
| |
Con Kolivas wrote: > On Saturday 14 January 2006 16:03, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>Ideally, balancing should be completely unaffected when all tasks are >>of priority 0 which is what I thought yours did, and why I think the >>current system is not great. > > > The current smp nice in mainline 2.6.15 is performance neutral when all are > the same priority. It's only this improved version in -mm that is not. >
Oh sure. I wasn't talking about performance though.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |