lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 16:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>Ideally, balancing should be completely unaffected when all tasks are
>>of priority 0 which is what I thought yours did, and why I think the
>>current system is not great.
>
>
> The current smp nice in mainline 2.6.15 is performance neutral when all are
> the same priority. It's only this improved version in -mm that is not.
>

Oh sure. I wasn't talking about performance though.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-14 07:08    [W:0.132 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site