Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:49:53 -0800 | From | Tony Lindgren <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/5] Add MMC password protection (lock/unlock) support V3 |
| |
* Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@indt.org.br> [060111 11:26]: > Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> [060111 06:44]: > > > >>On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:16:28AM -0400, Anderson Briglia wrote: > >> > >>>Russell King wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:15:00PM -0400, Anderson Briglia wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>When a card is locked, only commands from the "basic" and "lock card" classes > >>>>>are accepted. To be able to use the other commands, the card must be unlocked > >>>>>first. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>I don't think this works as you intend. > >>>> > >>>>When a card is initially inserted, we discover the cards via mmc_setup() > >>>>and mmc_discover_cards(). This means that we'll never set the locked > >>>>status for newly inserted cards. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>mmc_setup() calls mmc_check_cards(). Our patch adds the necessary code > >>>to mmc_check_cards() to set the locked state when the card is locked. > >> > >>Not in Linus' kernel, it doesn't. > >> > >>If you're working off the OMAP tree, bear in mind that I've found in > >>the past that they have a large number of wrong or inappropriate > >>changes to the MMC layer in there. They don't regularly merge either, > >>and they certainly don't forward any bug fixes for review in a timely > >>manner. > > > > > > I agree the omap MMC driver should be cleaned-up and finally merged. > > > > Anderson, since you are already patching it, do you want to take care of > > cleaning it up a bit and posting it here? > > OK Tony. I'll do it and post here asap.
Cool, thanks!
Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |