[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 23:24, Peter Williams wrote:
> Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > That seems broken to me ?
> But, yes, given that the problem goes away when the patch is removed
> (which we're still waiting to see) it's broken. I think the problem is
> probably due to the changed metric (i.e. biased load instead of simple
> load) causing idle_balance() to fail more often (i.e. it decides to not
> bother moving any tasks more often than it otherwise would) which would
> explain the increased idle time being seen. This means that the fix
> would be to review the criteria for deciding whether to move tasks in
> idle_balance().

Look back on my implementation. The problem as I saw it was that one task
alone with a biased load would suddenly make a runqueue look much busier than
it was supposed to so I special cased the runqueue that had precisely one

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-11 15:32    [W:0.098 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site