Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Sep 2005 20:40:54 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-stable] cpuset semaphore double trip fix |
| |
Chris wrote: > OK, we can hold until you find a good case for triggering ;-)
Agreed.
By the way, you or Randy mentioned something about leaving a mention of -stable in the MAINTAINERS file.
That wouldn't have helped me this week, but if you had put the string:
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
somewhere in the opening text of the messages that announce stable reviews, that would have saved me some time. I have in mind the lkml messages such as:
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/9] -stable review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.13.1 release.
Just a thought ...
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |