[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] earlier allocation of order 0 pages from pcp in __alloc_pages

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:11:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" <> wrote:
> >
> > It looks like we're now dropping into direct reclaim as the first thing
> > in __alloc_pages before even trying to kick off kswapd. When the hell
> > did that start? Or is that only meant to trigger if we're already below
> > the low watermark level?
> That's all the numa goop which Martin Hicks added. It's all disabled if
> z->reclaim_pages is zero (it is). However we could be testing that flag a
> bit earlier, I think.
> And yeah, some de-spaghettification would be nice. Certainly before adding
> more logic.
> Martin, should we take out the early zone reclaim logic? It's all
> unreachable at present anyway.

Yes, Please do.


Martin Hicks || Silicon Graphics Inc. ||
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-30 14:34    [W:0.049 / U:1.764 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site