lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Fix lost tick calculation in timer_pm.c
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 22:42 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
    > With this patch, time had kept up really well on one particular
    > machine (Intel 4way Pentium 3 box) overnight, while
    > on another newer machine (Intel 4way Xeon with HT) it didnt do so
    > well (time sped up after 3 or 4 hours). Hence I consider this
    > particular patch will need more review/work.
    >

    Are lost ticks really that common? If so, any idea what's disabling
    interrupts for so long (or if it's a hardware issue)? And if not, it
    seems like you'd need an artificial way to simulate lost ticks in order
    to test this stuff.

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-03 06:09    [W:0.020 / U:96.444 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site