lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Fix lost tick calculation in timer_pm.c
Lee Revell wrote:

> Are lost ticks really that common? If so, any idea what's disabling
>
>interrupts for so long (or if it's a hardware issue)? And if not, it
>seems like you'd need an artificial way to simulate lost ticks in order
>to test this stuff.
>
>Lee
>
>
Yes - I know many people with laptops who have this lost ticks problem.
So no simulation and/or
special efforts required. If anyone wants a test bed - my laptop is the
perfect instrument.

In my case the rip is always as acpi_processor_idle now a days. Earlier
it used to be at acpi_ec_read.

Parag
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-03 07:17    [W:0.540 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site