[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
    On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

    > That could be special cased and done lockless, with the counting
    > done per CPU.

    It's also not very hard for iptables when verifying the table to conclude
    that there really isn't any "real" rules for a certain hook and then
    delete that hook registration (only policy ACCEPT rule found). Allowing
    you to have as many ip tables modules you like in the kernel, but only
    using the hooks where you have rules. Drawback is that you loose the
    packet counters on the policy.

    Exception: iptable_nat. Needs the hooks for other purposes as well, not
    just the iptable so here the hooks can not be deactivated when there is no

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-28 02:28    [W:0.018 / U:1.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site