Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:10:17 -0400 | From | Daniel Jacobowitz <> | Subject | Re: PTRACE_SYSEMU numbering |
| |
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:46:38PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > The fix is easy, IMHO, and not even urgent. It suffices to move PTRACE_SYSEMU > def from <linux/ptrace.h> to <asm-i386/ptrace.h>, and we didn't do that yet > for laziness only. There's no architecture that I know of, apart i386, which > implements SYSEMU (except maybe s390, but that isn't public).
Please either renumber it to something above 0x4200, or make it i386 private. If you intend for other architectures to implement it in the future, renumbering it would be better.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |