lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
    James Morris a écrit :
    >
    > Do you have any performance measurements?

    Yes, as I said in the first mail :

    >In oprofile results, ipt_do_table() was at the first position.
    >It is now at 6th position, using 1/3 of the CPU it was using before.
    >(Tests done on a dual Xeon i386 and a dual Opteron x86_64)

    On the dual opteron machine, with 40.000 packets coming per second, and 35.000
    sent per second, the numbers were : 12.8 % before the patches, 4.4 % after the
    patches.

    I dont have separate perf measurements for each patch.

    Considering the fact that I inlined the read_lock_bh() call (not displayed in
    oprofile results, probably because of the special .spinlock.text section) that
    should have increased the profile of ipt_do_table(), thats a lot of CPU cycles
    and mem bandwitdh that are available for other jobs.

    Eric

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-22 07:10    [W:0.019 / U:89.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site