[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Instead of using one vmalloc() area (located in the node of the iptables
> process), we now allocate an area for each possible CPU, using NUMA policy
> (MPOL_PREFERRED) so that memory should be allocated in the CPU's node
> if possible.
> If the size of ipt_table is small enough (less than one page), we use
> kmalloc_node() instead of vmalloc(), to use less memory and less TLB entries)
> in small setups.

Maybe we better introduce vmalloc_node() instead of improvising this for
several subsystems? The e1000 driver has similar issues.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-22 00:46    [W:0.106 / U:24.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site