Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:09:58 +0400 | From | Alexey Dobriyan <> | Subject | Re: Arrr! Linux v2.6.14-rc2 |
| |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:50:46PM -0400, Sean wrote: > On Tue, September 20, 2005 12:44 pm, Jan Dittmer said: > > I know, but for multiple people testing daily releases it's much easier to > > say -git1 worked -git2 didn't. Sure, for searching the patch `git bisect` > > is priceless but for regular testing the -gitx thing comes very handy. > > Otherwise you can get a arbitrary intermediate state of linus tree if > > you're pulling at the wrong moment. It's actually also faster I suppose > > to get one patch than running `git pull` - at least with a cold cache > > (it used to be in the 0.1 days of git). > > Just my .02, > > That's a good point. Guess it would be useful if the HEAD commit was > documented along with each -gitX release.
Look for 41-byte *.id files in snapshots dir.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |